The idea for this came via a friend, and then I looked a bit more into it. Basically the spread between inflation protected US government bonds and standard US government bonds has become extremely small vs. history and even potentially nonsensical, which could be do to panic buying of US government bonds as money has sought a safe haven. Some investors might just have a mandate for plain bonds, rather than TIPs. Or perhaps there still isn't enough liquidity in the TIPs market to accommodate everyone.
As a reminder TIPs are US govt-backed just like standard bonds, plus protect for inflation. The odd thing is that right now, 10-year TIPs have a yield of 2.2%, vs. US 10-year treasuries at 2.47%. This is only a 0.27% spread despite TIPS carrying inflation protection, and means that the standard treasuries are priced as if US inflation will average just 0.27% per year for the next 10 years, which seems highly unlikely. While this market oddity didn't just happen, it nevertheless still exists, thus there could be an interesting opportunity if one were to create a trade based on the expansion of this spread going forward. Something along the lines of short treasuries, long TIPs.
I am unintentionally Long TIPs and short Treasuries right now, but there is probably a better way to do it than I have unintentionally set up. A spread sheet and some leverage could probably be one method, but given the times this is probably not the most popular way to explain a strategy! So perhaps just be unsophisticated and plain short treasuries.
(Vincent)
Vincent:
Couple things to be aware of.
1. If there is deflation (negative CPI) the TIPS don't just pay zero, they accumulate a deficit against future interest payments.
2. Do you trust the govt CPI data given how many expenditure increases are tied to it? That worries me.
My primary worry at this point is we enter a period of time where rates go up but inflation goes down. If rates don't go up, the govt will just borrow money and stimulate more until it no longer can (ie rates go up)
Posted by: Andrew Schmitt | January 07, 2009 at 10:07 AM
Good points. In terms of whether we are going into deflation, ok fair if one believes this, which is basically saying indeed inflation will be less than 0.27% for the next 10 years, as I said I thought was highly unlikely. Then yes, you are correct, then the straight treasuries would be better. But note that TIPs' principal is guaranteed regardless of deflation adjustments. They can only take away your interest.
I see what you're saying with the CPI as well, but standard treasuries won't help you any more on this potential problem. The spread is just 0.27% above the TIPs. Thus even if CPI is under-recorded, as long as it is recorded as 0.27% or more per year, then the TIPs are better.
In terms of inflation falling, even if inflation were lower over the next 10 years vs. the last, it could still easily be more than 0.27% despite being lower, thus again making the TIPs the better deal.
I agree with you on the direction of rates, thats why I think treasuries are bad deals right now, given govt tendencies. Also in relation to this, keep in mind that on the inflation front, its the kind of thing which the US government can have some control over. I think its pretty unanimously understood that the US will have a policy of low inflation rather than deflation. Thus I think your points still indicate the TIPs as better priced relative to standard treasuries. But I admit I did not think about deflation. If indeed someone expected that the next 10 years would be a period of deflation, to the point that 10 year average inflation was below 0.27%, then the standard bonds would be better. I guess the other thing to mention is that a near term deflationary environment could cause people to over-react, sending treasuries to even lower yields even if it was unrealistic that deflation would be long term. But this would only be a problem if your holding period was rather short term.
Posted by: Vincent (The Stalwart) | January 07, 2009 at 11:05 AM
Vincent- How do you short treasuries? Do you use an ETF or do you actually short an individual security?
Posted by: Biskee's Dad | April 10, 2009 at 01:10 PM
I guess the other thing to mention is that a near term deflationary environment could cause people to over-react, sending treasuries to even lower yields even if it was unrealistic that deflation would be long term. But this would only be a problem if your holding period was rather short term.
Posted by: buy maple story money | July 07, 2009 at 03:48 AM
Amazing information about TIPs vs. Treasuries - A Play on Inflation Being Over 0.27% Going Forward I really appreciate your info!!
Posted by: generic valtrex | February 01, 2010 at 10:36 AM
Well Thanks For displaying Information regarding Inflation.......
Regards,
James
Posted by: quick car insurance quote | February 04, 2010 at 11:52 PM
in my opinion While this market oddity didn't just happen, it nevertheless still exists, thus there could be an interesting opportunity if one were to create a trade based on the expansion of this spread going forward
Posted by: buy viagra | February 11, 2010 at 09:36 AM
Even though I have no clue of the current sentiment, with all the panic going on the drop may last a little longer yet, especially with people being all so negative about the GE.
Posted by: chi flat iron | February 24, 2010 at 10:42 PM
Thus I think your points still indicate the TIPs as better priced relative to standard treasuries.
Posted by: online generic viagra | March 29, 2010 at 08:56 AM
A Mideast diplomat who grabbed a surreptitious smoke in a jetliner's bathroom sparked a bomb scare and widespread alert that sent jet fighters scrambling to intercept the Denver-bound flight, officials said.
Posted by: Free iPad | April 08, 2010 at 05:13 AM
GAME IS GREAT
Posted by: sildenafil citrate | April 15, 2010 at 05:05 PM
These kind of post are always inspiring and I prefer to read quality content so I happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the post....
If you can pls. make more video posting
Posted by: Email Database | June 09, 2010 at 02:23 PM
I think the defeat to Dutchman, at this World Cup they deserved the victory more than others. I, though not an octopus, but predict a goal Sneijder.
http://swoonpasnela15420.co.cc/map6.html
Posted by: Lieniaupsenna | July 10, 2010 at 02:23 PM
I agree with the previous comment. I love this post that in spire me and continue to give me hope that someday i might be financially stable enough to enjoy life.
Posted by: free ipad | July 15, 2010 at 09:28 PM
I agree with the previous comment.I prefer to read quality content so I happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the post.
Posted by: iPad Free | July 18, 2010 at 04:47 AM
I think that many have missed a very important statistic and a trend in available new homes inventories (inventories of new homes are at a new low and well below long-term average). There are less and less of new homes available on the market.
New home inventories are down by 25.5% y/y (502K => 374K, down by 128K). It means that we should expect stabilization and possibly an increase in new home prices in the near future (like Spring 2009).
Posted by: free ipad | July 25, 2010 at 02:24 AM
we should work be such a significant of human satisfaction.A good share of the answer rest in the kind of pride that
is stimulated by the job, by the activity of accomplishing.Do you think so?
Posted by: jordan 1 flight low | July 28, 2010 at 04:59 AM
I agree! Thank you for the post.
Posted by: Retirement community | July 29, 2010 at 11:06 PM
But note that TIPs' principal is guaranteed regardless of deflation adjustments. They can only take away your interest.
Posted by: viagra online | August 14, 2010 at 03:06 PM
Great comments. I'm so happy you posted this.
Posted by: Alzheimer's | August 18, 2010 at 05:20 PM
I agree with Andrew.
Posted by: Alzheimer's | August 25, 2010 at 09:19 PM
Oh wow! I gotta look into this!
Posted by: prada bags | September 06, 2010 at 02:59 AM
I agree with the previous comment.I prefer to read quality content so I happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the post.
Posted by: cheap bags | September 15, 2010 at 02:50 AM
nice and easy to read and understand
Posted by: babyliss hair straighteners shop | September 24, 2010 at 04:34 AM
Five rounds before the league, real Moncler Madrid in complete 108 shots, but only 36 goals target, but only 6, and in the league at real Madrid in the road with levante 0-0 draw stuffy. Many goals Moncler jackets , but rarely shot to the two, including gonzalo higuain, cristiano ronaldo, but the striker is hard luck, The team is not to find the most effective method of attack, a lot of time doing futile. Norway media exposure, these blanket value 16,000-1.9 million moncler clothing krone. Was already for accepting these blanket taxes. The horse which moncler jackets in attack on the problem? Everyone moncler coats will give different answers, but at least the Spain international arbeloa, over 100 goals last season, the established fact decided, just as people can be retrieved cristiano ronaldo, real Madrid and shooting moncler sale boots can be sure to become the patriarchal team, and is a real fire obviously ridiculous. But the Norwegian media that ought not to be allowed, adamant4 politicians from personal use reserves during the gift in performing their duties, they shall receive as prescribed by the same as civil servants. ?In earlier today’s press conference, arbeloa to say, we are lucky to have cristiano ronaldo and gonzalo higuain, Moncler jackets sale I still remember last season in league together, they Moncler jackets Men both scored more than 60 goals, as the uefa champions league, I can’t remember exactly. But apparently enough, they are among the world’s top scorer.
Posted by: oniel | September 30, 2010 at 02:41 AM