For some reason, I find it incredibly unlikely. If we get to the point where the US turns of the printing press that pays the bills, then the whole idea of finance and money and ratings will have to be thrown out the window for awhile. Not saying it's inconcievable -- in a way it's the ultimate black swan, given that US bonds are the very definition of "risk free". And I'm pretty sure I agree with Eddy, that regardless of what S&P did, it wouldn't matter all that much:
B-Riz notes a WSJ story on the possibility of the U.S. government losing its triple-A rating. Barry, rightly, thinks S&P isn’t brave enough (though he alluded to their “stones”).
To me, it’s a hugely frivolous issue. U.S. Treasuries receive a credit rating every day. It’s better known as the price. I don’t see how some rating from a questionable firm could possibly have an impact greater than price movements. If anything, a downgrade would merely confirm what the market is already saying.
The post is very intellectually written, with lots of valuable information
Posted by: H Miracle Review | April 21, 2011 at 08:16 PM
di cui questo individuo cresciuto, lui o lei è diventata anche questa persona preparati su HIS / la sua terra. Parlare della circostanza inquietante, e mai così è stato Halloween. E 'stato prima il tipo di paesaggio orwelliano si può
Posted by: dr dre beats headphones | December 07, 2011 at 04:07 AM
ティンバーランド受け入れについて、同省の４月の調査では、全国５７２の市町村?一部事務組合が前向きな回答を寄せたが、放射性物質の影響を懸念する声が各地で上がり、１０月の調査では５４市町村?事務組合に激減した。
ティンバーランド現在、実際に受け入れを行っている都道府県は東京都だけで、受け入れの処理指針を策定中の大阪府には、これまで約１万件の反対意見が寄せられている。
Posted by: ティンバーランド | December 10, 2011 at 12:55 AM