Back in high school, I was in some sort of Ancient Civ. class, which required me to do some research into pyramids. While trawling through books at the school library, I came across one nutty monograph arguing that pyramids were not built of chiseled stones, but of poured concrete. Do I need to tell you that the delicious revisionism of this argument piqued my interest? Anyway, apparently the theory is far enough away from the fringe, such that it's being studies seriously. Courtesy of my old friend Mark Kuhar, editor of Pit & Quarry:
According to a report, researchers are exploring a new controversial theory, which suggests that the great pyramids of Giza may have been cast in place of concrete, rather than quarried and moved into position. The theory is being tested by researchers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US.
Although the idea that the Egyptians may have used a kind of concrete in building the pyramids was first suggested in the 1930s, with a specific material that could have been used proposed in 1988, so far there has been no proof and the idea has remained mired in controversy. Now, in order to help identify blocks that were cast rather than quarried, MIT students are assembling a small pyramid using a combination of both kinds of material.
di cui questo individuo cresciuto, lui o lei è diventata anche questa persona preparati su HIS / la sua terra. Parlare della circostanza inquietante, e mai così è stato Halloween. E 'stato prima il tipo di paesaggio orwelliano si può
Posted by: dr dre beats headphones | December 07, 2011 at 03:48 AM
ティンバーランド京都府の担当者も「処理の実働部隊となる市町村に受け入れを要請する際の国の基準が不明確で、検討する予定はない」としており、まずは国基準をさらに明確化する必要があると主張。滋賀県も、県内の全19市町が「受け入れ困難」としているため、県としても検討していないという。
ティンバーランドまた、近畿で唯一、広域連合に加盟していない奈良県の担当者も「県民の理解や感情論を考えると現状では難しい」と話している。
Posted by: ティンバーランド | December 09, 2011 at 10:08 PM