A recent study made the claim that Google has surpassed Microsoft and Coke in terms of brand value. I don't t really care to debate this too much, though it sounds reasonable to me.
That being said, I've never understood why Coke's brand was considered to be so valuable. It seems to me that the way to measure is strong brand is to see if you can slap it on something and turn it into a hit product. So, for example, Google can slap its brand on an online spreadsheet or a new video conferencing system, and people will adopt it. Coke has never been able to do this. Just think of the big list of failed Coke products. The only hits that the company Coca-Cola has had, outside of Coca-Cola itself (and Diet Coke) are non-Coke drinks. If the Coke brand were so strong, we'd be seeing a lot more people drinking Coca-Cola Blak right now, but we're not.
On a similar note, Felix Salmon points to a recent BW article about some creative stuff that Sears is doing to extract more value out of its brands, like Kenmore and Craftsman. Definitely worth a read.
More: Thinking about this question some more, there's another obvious way to determine if a brand is valuable. If a brand name allow a company to extract an abnormally high margin on the sale of a good, then it's a valuable brand. By this measure, Coke fails again, since a can of Coke is about the same price as a can of RC Cola. Also by this measure, a company like Cisco, which extracts very high margins on its hardware has much more brand value.
Your ability-to-extract-margins analysis only applies for commodity (or close) products. Cisco's margins probably have more to do with its IP than Coke's premium over store-brand cola has to do with its brand.
Posted by: Mr Juggles | April 26, 2007 at 07:05 PM
"It seems to me that the way to measure is strong brand is to see if you can slap it on something and turn it into a hit product"
But that is exactly what Coca Cola does. They sell some syrup to local franchises, who bottle and distribute the product. That product could be Coca Cola, could be Fanta. They are entirely Brand, and that brand has leveraged distribution networks. That is the value.
Also, the value of the brand is worldwide, and may lie more in Africa, SE Asia and so on, than you might expect. You buy Coke, you know you are getting a product that at the very least came from clean water.
Posted by: Maalarkh | April 27, 2007 at 05:12 PM
http://ycombinator.com/munger.html
http://freebsd.zaks.com/news/msg-1151459306-41182-0/
Availability. Association.
Posted by: 2L | April 28, 2007 at 03:03 PM
But Google already has slapped its name on a spreadsheet program and no one uses it.
Isn't the knock against Google that it's a one trick pony using a spaghetti-against-the-wall approach, throwing a bunch of new products out there to see what sticks (and almost nothing has)? If the brand was so powerful, why haven't they renamed YouTube? I doubt that will happen.
The one difference that seems hugely obvious is that I've never seen any type of Google ad on TV or radio and clearly Coke spends a ton to market its brand... but on the other hand the Google logo is everywhere on the net, where it's relevant.
At any rate, not that it matters, but I drink Cherry Coke or Diet Cherry Coke almost exclusively (or Coca-Cola Zero when I'm somewhere that doesn't have Cherry Coke).
Posted by: Nathan | April 29, 2007 at 10:56 AM
And I like the way that you can see into Mitt’ s heart and have decided he hasnt forgiven him. The truth seems to be that you are jealous. You look around your trailer park and Mitt Romney must make you ashamed. All that bull that your favorite televangelist has told you didnt work out too well… you are still a loser.
Posted by: het Stratumseind in Eindhoven | April 01, 2008 at 10:56 AM
Butalbital may cause you to become drowsy or less alert; therefore,
driving or operating dangerous machinery or participating in any hazardous activity that requires full mental alertness is
not recommended until you know your response to this drug. If you are being treated for severe depression or have a history
of severe depression or Soma Online abuse.
consult with your doctor before taking Tramadol Pills Use this drug with
caution if you are elderly or in a weakened condition, if you have liver or kidney problems, or if you have severe
abdominal trouble.
Posted by: Kim | June 11, 2008 at 11:04 AM
Your site is a good investment, keep it upreally appreciate it!!
I got this great site http://www.pharmacy-drugstore.org/
Posted by: Pharmacy Drugstore | March 16, 2009 at 02:56 AM
wow...
i really like this article.. thanks
Posted by: Buy Canada Viagra | March 17, 2009 at 12:53 AM
The brain is a mystery part of our body that need to be more studied is a nice article.
Posted by: Generic viagra | October 27, 2009 at 01:34 PM
These parameters to rate the price of a brand are excellent , nice article !
Posted by: Caffeine Addiction | November 02, 2009 at 11:09 AM
a brand cost what it produces.
Posted by: Buy Generic Viagra | November 04, 2009 at 06:12 PM
Coca cola has the biggest brand I think
Posted by: buy viagra brand | February 12, 2010 at 04:33 AM
American drugstores do provide a pharmacy, but most also sell books,
magazines, small electronics, food, personal care products, toys... In
other words, they are general stores that also fill prescriptions.
What is such a store called in ENglish by Europeans?
Posted by: Softadriponsi@gmail.com | April 12, 2010 at 07:51 PM
Wonderful post... Very informational and educational as usual!
Posted by: D-mannose | April 21, 2010 at 06:50 AM
Essentially, there are four approaches to valuing a Brand, and one or more of them may be applicable in any individual instance.
Posted by: Email Database | May 12, 2010 at 11:31 PM
I think the defeat to Dutchman, at this World Cup they deserved the victory more than others. I, though not an octopus, but predict a goal Sneijder.
http://takecomcong10715.co.cc/cat11.html
Posted by: Lieniaupsenna | July 11, 2010 at 02:34 AM
Don't know what is wrong what is rite but i know that every one has there own point of view and same goes to this one..
Posted by: autoboy | July 11, 2010 at 09:10 AM
Don't know what is wrong what is rite but i know that every one has there own point of view and same goes to this one..
Posted by: company logo design | July 14, 2010 at 05:45 AM
I totally agree. These big companies used to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars, sometimes millions, for a tv commercial. Bloggers are their new commercial, yet for some reason they think that we should do this for free. They think we have nothing better to do than to sit around blogging about their products while receiving no compensation. Who do they think is going to pay the rent and electric? I can assure you they are not working for free, so why should they expect us to?
Posted by: jordan retro 5 | October 07, 2010 at 04:59 AM
Economy the poor man's mints; extravagance the rich man's pitfall.
----------- by Martin Tupper. American economist.
Posted by: chanel | November 09, 2010 at 03:48 AM