Continuing on the theme of how capable we are of determining what is meaningful data, and what is statistical noise, check out this survey being conducted by Swiss graduate students. The user is given charts and asked to state whether they are looking at a stock chart or merely a randomly created line graph.
We could do this for hours!
(Found via Marginal Revolution)
Update: Try this a few times and, in the comments, let us know how you did. I'm 4 for 6 in correctly identifying which chart is the 'random walk'.
I was 2 for 3, but seriously how could you tell the difference? I bet over the long run most people are as a good as a coinflip.
Posted by: imcculley | December 12, 2005 at 03:38 PM
I was 4 for 5, I was never 100% sure of my answer but got it right. I wonder why we can get it right more than 50% of the time.
Posted by: Kevin | December 12, 2005 at 04:10 PM
I suspect it will work out to about 50% correct as well. I hope this work is published and publicized.
Posted by: The Stalwart | December 12, 2005 at 04:28 PM
cool stuff. I'm 3 for 4 but really needed the trading volume to feel like I could see it.
Posted by: mike simonsen | December 12, 2005 at 04:31 PM
Agreed on the trading volume, that makes it pretty easy as the major volume jump corresponds to the steep price increase/decrease on the real data while the fake data trails the volume jump. I'd bet people are about 50% without the volume and much higher with. My miss was w/o the volume.
Posted by: Kevin | December 12, 2005 at 04:48 PM
I think the real ones have more large gaps...i.e. the real distribution of stock returns are kurtotic whereas I presume they generate returns from a normal distribution.
Personally I got 4 out of 5.
Posted by: hedged | December 12, 2005 at 05:14 PM
I got 14/20. The trading volume helped, but it would have been even more helpful if the site allowed trendlines to be drawn. Other than CTA's, does anyone know of any specific investment managers who produce outsized returns by relying heavily on technical analysis? I'd be more of a believer in it if someone like Jim Simons utilized it in his trading. Jeff Vinik supposedly incorporates TA into his (very successful) methodology.
Posted by: Steve | December 12, 2005 at 07:34 PM
I got 5 of 7 correct. I wonder how many people are going to "correctly" predict the future of each of these systems. I'm guessing 20%.
Posted by: Brazos | December 12, 2005 at 09:11 PM
The link doesn't work anymore. :(
Posted by: Jane | July 13, 2010 at 11:51 PM
i love you post
Posted by: UGG Shoes | November 11, 2010 at 03:43 AM
Don't think you are the only customer shopping at a coach factory outlet store. On the contrary, there are many people who prefer to shop for accessories in coach outlet stores, being attracted by the diversity of products and the great prices. After all, who doesn't love coach outlet online? And as much as they love having a genuine leather coach outlet online, they are even more in love with the discounts offered for existing products. Coach factory outlet things, I guess you don't have to wonder any more why coach outlet online including coach outlet, they are so popular. They offer you the opportunity to pay an affordable price for a high-quality product, making sure that they cover the coach factory outlet and not only the segment with retail coach outlet online.
Posted by: coach outlet onlinet | December 26, 2011 at 03:42 AM