Size, Scale, Uptime, Downtime

Interesting discussion here on scale and size for internet upstarts.  Om contends that focusing on scalability and reliability is important, and that not focusing on it is a sign of short-term bubble mentality.  David, of 37signals, contends that "99.999% uptime is for Wal-Mart", and that a young company can afford 98% uptime if they focus on having a great product.  Here's a copy of the comment I left on Om's blog:

Jason (Ed Note: David actually) is wrong about uptime/downtime. If Wal-Mart is down for half an hour I’ll come back later, because there’s really no competition at those prices. If Technorati is down I’ll immediately start looking elsewhere, maybe Google blogsearch, Yahoo blogsearch, Sphere, PubSub, Feedster, etc. There’s no shortage of alternatives to try out, with absolutely $0.00 switching costs. To make matters worse, I might even like one of those other search engines, and remain a loyal user forever.

Even if I went to a Wal-Mart competitor for a day, it’s unlikely I’d be a permanently lost competitor.

Read Om's entire entry.

Update:  I think this makes this more interesting, about how much more rapidly the noise will grow as compared to a signal in any given network.  If adding more members to a service really does have marginal costs, and places a burden on the whole operation, then this becomes a structural problem for many companies.  Also, while Om thinks the lack of long-term planning, in Web 2.0, suggests bubble, I think the bubble-aspects lie elsewhere.

Comments

[ティンバーランド]

東日本大震災の被災地で山積みのがれきは、復興の妨げとなっている。大津波に襲われた岩手、宮城、福島３県の沿岸部は平坦（へいたん）な土地が少なく、港周辺の仮置き場のがれき処理が進まなければ、港や防潮堤の整備も始められない状態だ。

　ティンバーランド環境省によると、３県のがれきの推計量は６日現在で２２６５万トン。うち１５０９万トンが仮置き場に置かれたままだ。３県が県内の施設で処理する分を除く他府県への受け入れ要請量は計３９５万トンに上る。